From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Aborting display. Is this possible? Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20141019141712.GB3197@acm.acm> <83lhoccdv7.fsf@gnu.org> <20141019154255.GC3197@acm.acm> <83egu4c4om.fsf@gnu.org> <20141020110949.GA2947@acm.acm> <8338aidbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <20141020185757.GD2947@acm.acm> <83lhoabl2x.fsf@gnu.org> <20141020210819.GE2947@acm.acm> <87y4s9rgi9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141021105825.GA3035@acm.acm> <87mw8pr8ei.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413901564 9072 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2014 14:26:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 21 16:25:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaNn-0002n9-Oh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:25:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaNn-0007y4-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaNd-0007xl-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaNW-00005t-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgaNW-00005d-37; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s9LEPajY032067; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C7C34660D6; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:25:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87mw8pr8ei.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:04:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: ** X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 2.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered PENNY_STOCK_NO_HTML=1.5, PENNY_STOCK=1, RV5101=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5101> : inlines <1415> : streams <1322515> : uri <1827283> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175638 Archived-At: >> I've done some more measurements on my system: >> Autorepeat: delay between 1st event and 2nd event: 0.168s. >> delay between subsequent consecutive events: 0.024s. > That seems rather excessive. Usual I remember is 0.5/0.05, and that > already requires good aim. FWIW, I use "xset r 200 40", i.e. 0.2s/0.025s, so Alan's settings don't seem outlandish to me. Stefan