From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 51e7e46: Font-lock elisp macros/special forms dynamically Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20150315082509.21193.18465@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <55054CE9.6010702@dancol.org> <87bnjt4e00.fsf@gnu.org> <550681E3.7080407@dancol.org> <871tkpov7p.fsf@gnu.org> <877fug8z8u.fsf@gnu.org> <55073F67.20809@dancol.org> <87k2yg55jl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426610109 26240 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2015 16:35:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 17:34:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXuSF-00063Y-Rn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:34:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55941 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXuSF-0002nH-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXuSC-0002ln-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXuS5-00040g-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:50960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXuS5-000408-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABC785EB8; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB491E5B8D; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1C98AB4102; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:34:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k2yg55jl.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:36:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 132.204.24.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183961 Archived-At: >>> Isn't font-lock-flush supposed to be cheap? >> If you use jit-lock-mode, yes. If not, no. > Using it is the default. Is there a good reason a user might have > disabled it for elisp buffers? There ideally shouldn't be a good reason, no. It can be very useful while debugging font-lock-keywords, and things like that, but for "normal" use, jit-lock-mode should always be used in Elisp buffers. > If no one objects, I'm going to install the patch below anytime soon > when the master branch bootstraps again without > Eager macro-expansion failure: (void-function cl-every) Isn't this fixed already (at least, the cl-every I introduced has disappeared as a side-effect of a subsequent change)? Stefan