From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Flymake refactored Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87h8vmj3tr.fsf@lolita> <1507138648.1972.0@smtp.gmail.com> <874lre2von.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv566yjx.fsf@udel.edu> <87shex276r.fsf@gmail.com> <87efqh2sud.fsf@udel.edu> <877ew919hd.fsf@gmail.com> <87poa0z4ur.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507382902 27308 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2017 13:28:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 13:28:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 15:28:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0p9M-0006A5-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:28:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49787 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0p9T-0005rf-La for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0p9N-0005rQ-6t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0p9K-0001qw-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34317 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0p9J-0001qc-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0p99-0004pN-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:28:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:JS8xWSax/jfVpRYRC5+XIUp+0Xg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219217 Archived-At: > Yes, that is the natural way. But should it go into the emacs-26 branch? I'll let Eli&John decide. > Or rather wait for the rewrite to be merged to master and wait for Emacs > 27? In the latter case, I think a package is useful. I merged it to master yesterday, so there should be no need to wait any more. For python.el there'd be no need for a package since python.el itself is available via GNU ELPA. We could do the same for ruby-mode.el. Stefan