From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35739: Bad signature from GNU ELPA Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 14:38:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <835zqca15y.fsf@gnu.org> <83woir92vl.fsf@gnu.org> <83o93v83si.fsf@gnu.org> <83muje76wa.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1eh7rtj.fsf@gnu.org> <838sux7owx.fsf@gnu.org> <8336l56yuy.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhnb5238.fsf@gnu.org> <83pno74ozv.fsf@gnu.org> <83imtz3rzv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="20999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 35739@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 25 20:49:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbjJ-0005M7-1C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 20:49:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45209 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbjH-0005kh-VT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbj6-0005jh-8V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:49:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbaS-0006gn-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbaM-0006cl-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbaM-0007Ca-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 18:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35739 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35739-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35739.155880954727607 (code B ref 35739); Sat, 25 May 2019 18:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2019 18:39:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49627 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbZT-0007BD-29 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:42649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUbZQ-0007Ac-SJ for 35739@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 734E48116B; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CC0F80ACD; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:38:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1558809538; bh=ti0NJmjciw4WjV1lpeIOufu6EN0y2uw0kEKLFEDSHPw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=X7XiVgmR4JMOqsK0xZYDTGeOfDbYkBVCcxSOI7PKP02KvMMPOtAPPgYJuqTs1JtCF /dvH6P/AU4uwbOGpwr0eX0/jY5/xRWgrBIyhVCwCqoHZ98ZpQhCN7ul1u4Bi+mW26Z E5wY+IPiLymqbKyj/ZTCKNw1twG+Ysgi7JVON0M6Gr7M6Pk5TT37aBl0Azr43uLZ8P O0gJBm0isY7tZ2ctch+Y/267zEwQKyadtmmfC0+XdR4QYHj6wIhCa1o87OQuD00y+N +4ROaK0DpJL7tYUh5Md1ijlVwpm4tIpYCKyka/29m1gajsSImloVQZTsINJtg0/0jP XjrC3JHSk5f8w== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [167.88.27.42]) by mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 228FA1206EB; Sat, 25 May 2019 14:38:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83imtz3rzv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 25 May 2019 10:36:36 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159768 Archived-At: >> > I'm okay with documenting what that produces somewhere >> That would be a big help, > Where would you like this to be documented? Any place is fine by me (including a comment in a C file). But I guess it would be better in Texinfo somewhere so we can point to it more easily. > Btw, in two different messages in this thread you mentioned two > different situations. One is this: >> document what it means to insert decoded text into a unibyte buffer > The other is this: >> I don't know what decoding text into a unibyte buffer will do [ Indeed, I corrected myself along the way. ] I'm mostly interested in the second, because I think I know what the first does (tho I think what it does is basically flawed, a holdover from the Emacs-20/21 days where most code was so hopelessly confused about chars-vs-bytes that it was a good idea to try and patch things over so it at least keeps working for environments like latin1 and koi-r, but nowadays we'd be better off signaling errors to try and fix the remaining confusion). Stefan