From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 27.1 Windows Binaries -- testing wanted Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:10:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pn7oft7r.fsf@gnu.org> <5fd1bc533b4bfe603d106fb3ee816208@russet.org.uk> <83364keznu.fsf@gnu.org> <87imdgrlpq.fsf@telefonica.net> <83tuwzewxa.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeo3sxw0.fsf@telefonica.net> <83sgcjevf3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7sze56q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15981"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 19 15:16:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8NxS-0003zy-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:16:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8NxR-0006m4-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:16:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8Nro-0000wc-O5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:58828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8Nrm-0006jK-Ll; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8335010043D; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:10:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9747B1003B9; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:10:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1597842654; bh=G0x99AWG5nxx07qnO77mYd1M82iGgdETFcVAzY1Glsk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LDsTMdcnlKnTVRGYWGEio1z9oiH5jBzNINzvVNU5UBr3UH0nEH9LMSmg2nKMgjxQY JqsvU2KSGwKSg7UjbSFxrhNl+5iLLwCb+tK1sgxJBcsfqjYz8uAelH/HrBcnnEqdiK MB6TyMEakjNhHE20enN5OB75ieh+HzDTimHY3+KFPV3XTOyXPFRMJl/KcKyJmHDJAJ /F1hb2E5/7mnRSOv2fK7MUeMuPXQ8bq+2JT7YHguQ4XlI2tkZalf1n80xrk118F5qi Lt7WVk9E62rI355563avvkXrvsh5Z/LdMq0VWWyUp4Mtg9Bpz+0ovubgzWohygCuqp V0LHBpCVXG0Ng== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.246.108]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 178581204B0; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:10:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83h7sze56q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:32:29 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/19 09:10:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254000 Archived-At: >> FWIW, it might still be useful on posix hosts to show the set of >> features that were compiled-in vs those that were not. > We already have that, via the variables that were mentioned up-thread. I don't think those variables show directly what was *not* compiled in. Stefan