From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:59:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> <83edop6sdy.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <834jpk5hih.fsf@gnu.org> <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10818"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , joaotavora@gmail.com To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 13 19:00:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0J3-0002f4-9c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 19:00:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0Io-0008Oe-4r; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0Im-0008OM-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0Im-0004mu-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0Ik-0004ER-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168140518716218 (code B ref 62720); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2023 16:59:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0IU-0004DV-LG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:59:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31783) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pn0IS-0004DG-Jb for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 437248091E; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:59:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 090F88041E; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:59:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1681405178; bh=C/l2kFPSync1ynnHZKzEZ7qZ0FJsfTA/4rqtEsJABNk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=P3uCU91gwU1uWB117Q6HzOyrHOg86QBRYLacREN3I9SPgMIauQrpXJ2Lv0pmtyTjM FbuCwDZWp4eq6+OTx7YTY2hY3z1h7eYr1AtzxlK2xIMg0zuQbOwm4PvozVO0FcEEX5 LndvsM2jf8yKjJwW5agpM6PzV+Q3UP4xs1EeXUXq50h9+aiktdR12Yt2NoIW4oDh2L hsWk3DFdShmY5mDqHura7O4TLDmW2qZlpmGoeqmmWLHIG0viyXAI8IdzFa7JaEnlRi 3tazyEphIgvw0Tbk4siwtKJCMfk44io4nlnOmTwvyrORaLqWcdRjwILoA9pej7bj3v ntXv5KGOhXXag== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.44.229.252]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C870A120329; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:59:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:23:12 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259870 Archived-At: >> Why did the original code use symbol-name, but the new one doesn't? > To my knowledge, completing-read given a collection of symbols will use > the symbol names as candidates, or is this more complicated? It mostly works. Strictly speaking a completion table can be either: - a list of strings - an alist whose keys are either strings or symbols and the code handles those two cases together so a list of symbols tend to work just as well, but if your first symbol happens to be `lambda` or `closure`, you're out of luck. Stefan