From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch Date: 09 May 2004 12:42:11 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <874qqwrycm.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <20040505221256.GB7789@fencepost> <20040508013940.GB6489@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084121254 29783 80.91.224.253 (9 May 2004 16:47:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 16:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun May 09 18:47:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BMrSS-0000nm-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2004 18:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BMrSS-0006cp-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2004 18:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BMrOB-00025z-Dj for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 12:42:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BMrO1-00024N-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 12:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BMrNV-0001vW-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 12:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BMrNV-0001uz-G3; Sun, 09 May 2004 12:42:13 -0400 Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEB821216; Sun, 9 May 2004 12:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4CBDB8C6AE; Sun, 9 May 2004 12:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, requis 5, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22980 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22980 > The order should be reversed for face-inheritance. Agreed, because it is the least disruptive change (multiple inheritance is very rarely used, if ever). I still think that face-remapping should rely on face-inheritance rather than allow mapping a face to several (merged) faces. Stefan