From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode" Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <456152B2.6040307@ubin.jp> <45641140.5050502@ubin.jp> <4566A16F.2030605@ubin.jp> <456A95B3.2020200@ubin.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164824744 9360 80.91.229.2 (29 Nov 2006 18:25:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 29 19:25:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpU7O-0005Ob-G1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:25:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpU7N-0006eT-Vp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GpU1w-00025w-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GpU1s-00022H-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpU1r-00021u-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GpU1m-0002wC-EL; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB492CEB8E; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269E13FE1; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:21 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0E8696C48C; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:21 -0500 (EST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed\, 29 Nov 2006 11\:26\:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63049 Archived-At: > They'd think "Damn, Richard! What got into you?". > Seriously, I think we're wasting our time here: this problem does not > impact functionality. > I am skeptical of these statements. > Could you present reasons for them? IIRC the "problem" was that Emacs warned the user that lazy-lock is obsolete and that she can fix that via font-lock-support-mode. That's no loss of functionality: lazy-lock works just as well as ever, AFAIK. Stefan