From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unicode character read representation Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87hc2n28a4.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235513877 23047 80.91.229.12 (24 Feb 2009 22:17:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 24 23:19:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lc5cL-0002jo-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:19:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lc5b0-0007DK-O6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lc5ZY-0006bb-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lc5ZW-0006az-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40273 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lc5ZW-0006ar-A2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:14 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:27558 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lc5ZW-0007Nq-1g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:14 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsQEAHoApElFxKYM/2dsb2JhbACBb9ZjhBEGg1s X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,261,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="34325933" Original-Received: from 69-196-166-12.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.166.12]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2009 17:16:13 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 104BDB419A; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:14:14 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109319 Archived-At: > Currently Emacs signals an error only for U+400000 and over, > and I'm not sure how strictly we should interprete > \U.. notation. I think the \U notation should only work for actual unicode chars. (assuming the \x{..} notation can be used for everything else). Stefan