From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rcirc: Too many default keybindings for rcirc-next-active-buffer Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7b501d5c0908170940u79896ab7lba193bd052c7194@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250533970 24882 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2009 18:32:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel , Deniz Dogan To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 17 20:32:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Md70b-0006aM-Kg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:32:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40046 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md70a-0000MU-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md70O-0000JJ-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md70J-0000HB-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60670 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md70J-0000H7-IE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:23718 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Md70J-0006AW-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:23 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAMM+iUpFpZNo/2dsb2JhbACBUtRzhBkFh0k X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,398,1246852800"; d="scan'208";a="43674228" Original-Received: from 69-165-147-104.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.147.104]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2009 14:31:50 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 15D6A82F0; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:01:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114348 Archived-At: >> I'll go out on a limb and say that most people probably use C-c C-SPC >> and very few use C-c ` or C-c C-@. > C-@ is the same as C-SPC on terminals, so they should always have the > same binding. Actually, shouldn't this just argue for ttys to have a mapping from C-@ to C-SPC in function-key-map? Stefan