From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [vc-git] Showing =?utf-8?b?4oCYLmdpdC8q4oCZ?= files in vc-dir Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:30:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4C2A5279.2080706@cybersprocket.com> <4C2C4573.1060203@swipnet.se> <4C2C5E9C.1000701@swipnet.se> <4C2CC18E.8080901@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279899592 28611 80.91.229.12 (23 Jul 2010 15:39:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eric James Michael Ritz , Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 23 17:39:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OcKLk-00086R-BY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:39:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OcKCi-0001PX-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:30:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59169 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OcKCc-0001PG-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OcKCb-0007GE-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:49456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OcKCb-0007Ff-1l; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-78.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.78]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o6NFUBth028577; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3EB2B660D2; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:30:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4C2CC18E.8080901@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv=22?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?'s?= message of "Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:25:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3584=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127706 Archived-At: > I'm not familiar with the inner workings of vc, so when I say vc-dir > I really mean vc as a whole. Anyway, what you say is of course correct, but > if there are both edited and unregistered, C-x v v in this case should say > vc-checkin. After all, commit is far more common than register. I guess I mostly agree except that I'd throw out the "vc-next-action" altogether and replace it with vc-commit (at least in *VC-Dir*). Stefan