From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8626: 24.0.50; (elisp) Region to Fontify after a Buffer Change - Why a child of Multiline Font Lock? Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 11:46:26 -0300 Message-ID: References: <078B0330CA3C43959F4638AC9055DB76@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304693231 15422 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2011 14:47:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 14:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8626@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 16:47:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMJ8-0002WK-T1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:47:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMJ8-0001MU-Gm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMJ6-0001K6-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMJ5-0007SH-7r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMJ5-0007SD-6U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMJ4-0005ZK-Gu; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8626.130469319821372 (code B ref 8626); Fri, 06 May 2011 14:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2011 14:46:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMIf-0005Yf-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:46:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMId-0005YT-Ti for 8626@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:42453 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIMIY-0001rb-DI; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B82C066168; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:46:26 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <078B0330CA3C43959F4638AC9055DB76@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 6 May 2011 07:01:25 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 10:47:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46275 Archived-At: > What limits the import of this node to multiline font-lock? > Nothing that I can see. Maybe the problem is "your" notion of "multiline font-lock"? There's no such thing as a "multiline font-lock" feature or functionality, but only "Multiline Font Lock Constructs", i.e. there are cases where a major mode needs to get font-lock to recognize elements that span multiple lines. > This node is about refontification after buffer changes. It is not, > logically, a subnode of `Multiline Font Lock Constructs'. It is about having to extend the refontification area because refontifying a single-line is not sufficient, presumably because the major mode has to handle a multiline font-lock construct. Stefan