From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r107222: Document url-queue-retrieve Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bop6oje3.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328901129 8652 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2012 19:12:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 20:12:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvvt4-0007Nl-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:12:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvvt4-0004Vc-69 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvvt1-0004Uy-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvvt0-00046g-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:45394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvvsz-00046c-Vr; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:58 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0IADtrNU9MCqD0/2dsb2JhbABErl5+gQiBcgEBBAFWIwULCw4JHRIUGA0WDogPuQWJJoIZKgUKAzoMBwgGBAUDAYNjBYQTBIhJmw+EWg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,397,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="162523281" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-244.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.244]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Feb 2012 14:11:57 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C0A0D58F68; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:25:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148460 Archived-At: > PS could we curb this trend of following up on the diffs list? That would be good, yes. I don't think it's a terrible problem, but we shouldn't post to *-diffs. I do post occasionally, but always by mistake. For the elpa-diffs list, I've set the dreaded Reply-To to emacs-devel, but it seems this was not done in the emacs-diffs. I'm not sure Reply-To: is the right approach (when replying to those messages, I most often only want to reply to the sender rather than to emacs-devel). I guess we could otherwise set a spam filter that rejects message with "Subject: Re:". Stefan