From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109264: * alloc.c (Fgarbage_collect): Indent as per usual Emacs style. Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <50170EF9.1010307@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343689915 25318 80.91.229.3 (30 Jul 2012 23:11:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 31 01:11:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Svz7z-0003pL-Ac for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:11:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svz7y-0000LD-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svz7w-0000Kw-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svz7v-0008Hq-B8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:46264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svz7v-0008Hj-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6UNBgOS013034; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9B069AE2DC; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:11:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <50170EF9.1010307@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:47:21 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4295=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4295> : streams <792360> : uri <1179407> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151985 Archived-At: >> the GNU coding style additionally recommends to cut the line >> before rather than after infix operators. I.e. >> double nlive >> = (total_conses + total_symbols + total_markers + total_strings >> + total_vectors + total_floats + total_intervals + total_buffers); > Sure, but that "=" is not an infix operator; it's > not an operator at all. Technically, it's > punctuation that is part of an init-declarator. I do not think the GNU coding style cares about such philosophical nitpicks. Stefan