From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83lig3yaci.fsf@gnu.org> <871uhvh8c6.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348245380 22900 80.91.229.3 (21 Sep 2012 16:36:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 21 18:36:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TF6DI-0001nU-Bs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:36:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF6DD-0001iB-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF6D2-0001ek-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF6Cr-0005Lt-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:52523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF6Cr-0005Le-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8LGZvoL026652; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 15080B404D; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:35:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871uhvh8c6.fsf@wanadoo.es> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22=D3scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:24:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153438 Archived-At: >> Based on my experience, I expect this "feature" to be hated, by users >> and Emacs maintainers alike. > FWIW: I have no problem about attaching a backtrace to a bug report. A > core dump file? Never. Note that those backtraces are largely useless without the associated binary. Stefan