From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlay mechanic improvements Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:12:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871tr6qup8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zjdsyks8.fsf@gnu.org> <83tx40yf5n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411330402 7450 80.91.229.3 (21 Sep 2014 20:13:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 21 22:13:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XVnVR-0005Sh-Py for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:13:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40778 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVnVR-00049e-8u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVnVH-00048G-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVnVA-0005RI-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:49739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVnUu-0005Mw-Sd; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:12:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMQCzQSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4AQOpGYFqg0wh X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMQCzQSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4AQOpGYFqg0wh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="90491815" Original-Received: from 69-165-145-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.165.145.6]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Sep 2014 16:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2994AAE80E; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:12:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83tx40yf5n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:58:12 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174622 Archived-At: >> Of course it does, but the algorithm I suggest we use handles it >> just fine. > What algorithm? The one described in the "Augmented tree" section of the "Interval tree" wikipedia page. Stefan