From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: save-excursion and the mark Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:36:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20150224103716.5cb7c25f@anarchist.wooz.org> <54F20E0A.3000600@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425274595 19932 80.91.229.3 (2 Mar 2015 05:36:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 05:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: barry@python.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 02 06:36:23 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YSJ1j-0000NS-0n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:36:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSJ1i-0007gd-Au for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:36:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSJ1e-0007d9-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:36:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSJ1d-0000FU-MB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:36:18 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:42024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSJ1a-0000Dw-3O; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:36:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t225a66t027514; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 00:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 11F81AE124; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 00:36:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <54F20E0A.3000600@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:50:50 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5232=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5232> : inlines <2328> : streams <1398536> : uri <1868743> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183556 Archived-At: > I would make the change and wait until someone complains. IMHO this is > the cheapest way to find out whether anyone really wants this to restore > the mark. Indeed, given that I still haven't found any example where it would matter, the next step is likely to try it out. Stefan