From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:25:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433370378 10291 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 22:26:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 22:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thibaut Verron Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 04 00:26:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H6i-0002HV-AF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:25:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H6h-0002Nu-6M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56647) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H6a-0002Nn-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H6X-0003Zb-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:25:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:28190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H6X-0003ZH-5T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:25:45 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AsEwA731xV/3K9xEVcgxCEAoVVuzcJh0sEAgKBPDkUAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBBwIBH4s6hQUHhC0Fsz+BRSOCChyBbiKCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0AsEwA731xV/3K9xEVcgxCEAoVVuzcJh0sEAgKBPDkUAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBBwIBH4s6hQUHhC0Fsz+BRSOCChyBbiKCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="124133201" Original-Received: from 69-196-189-114.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.189.114]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Jun 2015 18:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 47495661A6; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:25:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Thibaut Verron's message of "Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:36:05 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187006 Archived-At: > testing strings for equality in emacs lisp is already tricky enough! Now, regardless of whether I agree with the rest of what is being said in this thread, this part really puzzles me. I do think there are some tricky/subtle issues in string equality testing in Emacs, but these are sufficiently subtle that most people will never know about them. So, what are you referring to here? Stefan