Re: Another pcase-lambda

[Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>]

>> > BTW, what I sometimes do miss is `pcase-defun'.
>> Was that a thing that existed?
> No, it never existed, but maybe it should?  pcase argument matching is
> not only useful for anonymous functions.  I often wanted it for named
> helper functions and had to `defalias' to a `pcase-lambda'.

There a "case" to be made that all variable bindings should support the
pcase syntax (i.e. dolist should be pcase-dolist, let should be
pcase-let, ...).


        Stefan