From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] main 2ec80977e1: * elpa-packages (dired-preview): New package Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <168884609732.27984.6450580686777461843@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230708195457.95F1AC11DD8@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87zg43iprw.fsf@posteo.net> <87edlfbjsx.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87v8eqc2k9.fsf@posteo.net> <87ilaq8jwq.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17319"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Protesilaos Stavrou , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 20:46:06 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qJINC-0004Hg-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 20:46:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJIMY-0004lp-BM; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJIMU-0004fe-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJIMS-0007bO-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E07FB441BAA; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 47613441B20; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1689101114; bh=aieKBd52BfavOPP3lFwBX344LoJaycgO+r85b+DOtyc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=cQl60JrklcawuCrGGH/FiH2n8UF0HDL7iGsBuNiUoKZHm/bZYf4grm/6mqHrPuj8J azFoXD7AW0/fpan1zen+z6T/rXa7H72xLvnwOF0/4zbAUBTUzfSSlT6KuMk9GnLMvA SwZXX5jU0TZ0UEq5BWeM94futvfDzwKNgQ3+++PINfASMtkwJkxIfQNiG3mxJfcNFL E78cm5lBs5c3FhhVKHTkCfh80zcUbNyZ5ve8Ma65JR4qOWfIKTm5oPHdMb3/4lPbsB griBErMcIBRMAk16aMFBnQSqixAr6rIksYnuJSWLxQekO6ozb3xvzVz314ijVBKlHT w6FUvhPF3ADig== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [23.233.149.155]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25664120264; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ilaq8jwq.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:58:29 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307759 Archived-At: >> (concat "\\." >> (regexp-opt "mkv" "webm" "mp4" "mp3" "ogg" "m4a" >> "gz" "zst" "tar" "xz" "rar" "zip" >> "iso" "epub" "pdf")) > > Of course, modulo > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (1 . 2) 15) :-) > Obviously, one would just have to wrap the arguments in the list but > that together with the separate concat makes it less comfortable than > `rx' to me. But worth mentioning! I just mentioned it for those cases where `rx` is shunned for a reason or another. Stefan