From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How about a new pretest? Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:52:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wt4pccoo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <458A6643.4090500@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166824606 9681 80.91.229.10 (22 Dec 2006 21:56:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 22 22:56:44 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxsNZ-0004oC-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:56:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxsNV-0006wn-7Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:56:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxsNF-0006uU-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:56:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxsNB-0006qL-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:56:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxsNB-0006qG-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.201.199.67] (helo=alfajor.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GxsKn-0003ke-AT; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:53:45 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DFD8E1C628; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:52:39 -0500 (EST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Fri\, 22 Dec 2006 01\:34\:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64135 Archived-At: > Unfortunately, I just discovered (by reading the code) that datagram > support is severely broken on Windows -- it can send datagrams, but > not receive them reliably. > So datagram support should probably be disabled too. I don't know of any elisp code that uses datagram sockets, so it's not a big deal, is it? > IMO, it is not "improving for Windows alone" ... it is a matter of making > the Windows port work like the other ports. I think it only makes sense if it allows simplification of other (generic) code. Stefan