From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make-glyph-code incompatibility Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:35:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <873ar773m1.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87tzjm95fo.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204670170 29347 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 22:36:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 23:36:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWfjw-00030t-GS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:36:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfjP-00053p-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfj5-0004lQ-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:35:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfj3-0004kc-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWfj3-0004kV-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWfiz-0005mD-TG; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-58.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.58]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m24MZDvW017793; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 845F5B40AF; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:35:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:44:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered BAYES_00=-2.5, HAS_X_HELO=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91327 Archived-At: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Yes. But you could make the new code use different symbols, and make >> > old symbols be unbound. That would cause error messages early enough. >> >> What symbols? The display table slots? > No, I meant make-glyph-code and other related functions/variables. > Sorry for being unclear. I still don't understand: the problem is with code that does *not* use make-glyph-code and builds the code "by hand" with operations such as lsh and +. Stefan