From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pretest, devel and bug lists Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <007201c8c038$e401e490$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <483C7BC7.3030700@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211997673 20463 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2008 18:01:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 18:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, Jason Rumney To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 28 20:01:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K1Py0-0001oq-Or for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 20:01:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37150 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1PxF-0006hw-C6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1PxB-0006hr-Pn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1PxA-0006hY-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43835 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1PxA-0006hV-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:35116) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1Pwu-0000GP-BR; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-80.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.80]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m4SI0mZk023639; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 60EEEB41E2; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Wed, 28 May 2008 11:10:49 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3026=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97918 Archived-At: > I think that all the messages from the bug tracker > should be sent to a separate list, and NONE should be sent > to emacs-devel or bug-gnu-emacs. The way things are setup now: - all mail to bug-gnu-emacs first goes through the bug-tracker. I.e. all mail received by bug-gnu-emacs recipients comes from the bug-tracker. - emacs-pretest-bug and emacs-devel are competely separate from the bug-tracker. So we have exactly what you describe, except that bug-gnu-emacs is now the "separate bug-tracker list". Stefan