From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display-based word wrapping Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y74x9rfl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <858wwx5iv9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87myldt4vy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214184225 20507 80.91.229.12 (23 Jun 2008 01:23:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 23 03:24:30 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAanE-0007p8-Np for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:24:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAamO-0004Cw-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAamK-0004Cr-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAamI-0004Cf-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35913 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAamI-0004Cc-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:30 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:9520 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAamF-0006Xg-K0; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:27 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqgEAGCXXkjO+KWv/2dsb2JhbACBW6wq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,686,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="23078734" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2008 21:23:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.165.175]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id DHU82826; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:26 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 69B8B83BA; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:23:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87myldt4vy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:40:49 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99744 Archived-At: >>> truncate-partial-window-width override should have the same meaning and >>> take precedence if non-nil. >> >> For truncate-partial-window-width OTOH, I think it would make sense to >> allow it to be an integer to mean "truncate if the window is less than >> this number". But that's unrelated to word-wrapping, > It's a good idea, and it's actually fairly closely related to > word-wrapping. If truncate-partial-window-width is a sufficiently small > number, it wouldn't interfere with word wrap for fairly large-sized > windows. For small windows, it would make sense to truncate instead of > word wrapping. > So maybe this is a good solution. Solution to what? Stefan