From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete? Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229914177 7919 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2008 02:49:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ken Manheimer , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 22 03:50:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LEasS-0005KP-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:50:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEarG-0002F2-Bp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEarB-0002E8-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEar9-0002Dw-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56208 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEar9-0002Dt-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:44906 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LEar9-0003Zf-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:19 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAH+OTklMCqBi/2dsb2JhbACBa7pcWI8HhkOBWg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,261,1228107600"; d="scan'208";a="31357017" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-98.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.98]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2008 21:49:18 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A108F84A4; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:49:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:41:09 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107166 Archived-At: >>> With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete? >> I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of >> PGG author(s) and users. Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete? > There seems to be no objections. Shall we go ahead marking it obsolete? Apparently, PGG is still used by allout.el, so we should try and get Ken to update his code to use EPG instead before we mark PGG obsolete. But please add a node about this to pgg.el (something like "On its way to obsolescence, waiting for allout.el to switch to EPG."). Stefan