From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
Cc: 6076@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#6076: 23.1.96; [PATCH] rcirc-complete for nicks and commands
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 14:29:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvocgvr0oa.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vdb3y7bv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 04 May 2010 19:18:09 +0300")
>> I guess the right solution is to improve completion-at-point so that it
>> can be told to use cycling (the functionality is already provided by the
>> minibuffer-force-complete command).
> `flyspell-auto-correct-word' (bound to M-TAB) that cycles through
> completions could use this as well.
Even more so, yes, because the choice between completion and cycling
is not just a preference for this one.
>> This relates to a larger question: how to provide "in-buffer" the
>> variety of completion commands seen in minibuffer completion.
>> I.e. minibuffer-completion-help, minibuffer-force-complete,
>> minibuffer-complete-word, icomplete-mode, ...
> Is the problem in the implementation of these commands or in choosing
> key bindings for them available for "in-buffer" completion?
I'm not sure. We could try and provide key bindings for all those
commands, but that would seem close to impossible: we're talking about
keybindings that would mostly need to be very short (single-key) to be
worthwhile, and we really don't have that many single-key available.
So, I see it as an implementation problem where we want to make
in-buffer completion modal to some extent: when in-buffer completion is
started you'd be put into a new "mode" (kind of like isearch, I guess),
where new completion commands become available. The main problem is
how/when to leave this mode (it should be as seamless as possible).
Some other reason for such a change: we want to be able to run code when
completion is finished, e.g. to hide the *Completion* buffer.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-02 8:49 bug#6076: 23.1.96; [PATCH] rcirc-complete for nicks and commands Leo
2010-05-02 9:01 ` Leo
2010-05-04 13:41 ` Leo
2010-05-03 16:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-05-03 17:45 ` Leo
2010-05-04 2:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-05-04 16:18 ` Juri Linkov
2010-05-04 18:29 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2010-05-04 20:01 ` Juri Linkov
2010-05-04 21:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-05-10 19:14 ` Juri Linkov
2010-05-11 1:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-05-11 16:54 ` Juri Linkov
2010-05-11 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-08-23 10:36 ` Leo
2010-09-03 22:13 ` Ryan Yeske
2010-09-04 8:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-09-04 10:21 ` Leo
2010-09-04 21:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-09-06 17:52 ` Leo
2010-09-11 12:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-09-11 13:03 ` Leo
2010-09-12 11:11 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvocgvr0oa.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=6076@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=juri@jurta.org \
--cc=sdl.web@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.