From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6299: In read-file-name: (args-out-of-range "c:" 0 3) Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 23:34:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275191863 3137 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2010 03:57:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 03:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6299@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 30 05:57:41 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIZee-00086d-Kp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 05:57:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38022 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIZee-0003MV-1q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57830 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIZeZ-0003LW-7z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:57:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIZeX-0005Jd-UC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIZeX-0005JZ-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIZIk-0007Iq-9q; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 03:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6299 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6299-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6299.127519045528060 (code B ref 6299); Sun, 30 May 2010 03:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6299) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2010 03:34:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIZHx-0007IX-Uf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIZHw-0007IS-3l for 6299@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:34:12 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAP55AUxMCpdY/2dsb2JhbACeO3K8I4UWBIxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,326,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="65997986" Original-Received: from 76-10-151-88.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.151.88]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 29 May 2010 23:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9EE3881F8; Sat, 29 May 2010 23:34:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 30 May 2010 02:10:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 23:35:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37413 Archived-At: >> my guess is that (file-name-directory "c:") return "c:/". > Yes, that is the case, it returns "c:/". What about (file-name-nondirectory "c:")? And what about (file-name-all-completions (file-name-nondirectory "c:") (file-name-directory "c:")) ? -- Stefan