From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7368: display-buffer a softly dedicated window Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:10:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290111331 20374 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2010 20:15:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7368@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 21:15:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAt3-00037E-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:15:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJAt2-0005Mq-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60391 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJAsF-0004yx-Di for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAsD-0000oB-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAsD-0000o7-DV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAWZ-0006XX-Tq; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:52:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:52:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7368 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7368-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7368.129010990525119 (code B ref 7368); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:52:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2010 19:51:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAWG-0006X6-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:51:44 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJAWE-0006X1-Px for 7368@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:51:43 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oAIJucv7016856; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:56:38 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7C98AA82AD; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:10:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?="'s message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:57:32 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3683=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:52:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41738 Archived-At: > I strongly believe display-buffer and switch-to-buffer should do the > same thing in the following minimal example: This is irrelevant because calling switch-to-buffer from Elisp is a bug in my book. One important property of soft-dedicated windows is that the window's buffer won't be changed except upon explicit request from the user (with C-x b). Stefan