From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:04:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87hb0b3yoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6ED011D5-E185-44C6-BB31-A445A4E5F83A@gmail.com> <87wr976otx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqi6tzz.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <87ehve3ul8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lipl22xm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqh20ha.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871urc46c9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <739bsoysp.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87ty47r5yt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k452p5u3.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326071104 24735 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2012 01:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:05:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 02:05:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk3fY-0001b7-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:05:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52559 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk3fY-0002ON-G1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk3fV-0002O5-Lz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:04:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk3fU-0003da-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:04:57 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:56183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk3fU-0003dG-95 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:04:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0914sTO003969; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:04:54 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DE13358F7E; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:04:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87k452p5u3.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:33:08 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4095=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4095> : streams <717996> : uri <1043263> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147496 Archived-At: > What I've now propsed, after Chong clarified the maintainers' position, > is the same service, enabled by default but with no packages (so an > interested user only has to customize one variable and it does nothing > otherwise). I think that's the middle ground we've been looking for. > I only need to know, from Stefan or Chong, if that proposal is OK and if > it should go into the current trunk or if it should wait until 24.1 is out. I don't see a problem with it, but it's too late for 24.1. Stefan