From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12119: 24.1.50; symbol-macrolet regresssion Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:20:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344270083 6580 80.91.229.3 (6 Aug 2012 16:21:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12119@debbugs.gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 06 18:21:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQ3W-0001ur-53 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:21:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQ3V-0004pE-7I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQ3O-0004or-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQ3I-00013q-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQ3I-00013m-7e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQAv-0000Rb-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12119 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12119-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12119.13442704941645 (code B ref 12119); Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12119) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2012 16:28:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37736 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQAA-0000QU-1f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:52457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SyQA8-0000QO-Ft for 12119@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q76GKI62015015; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 60A24B41E3; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:20:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Helmut Eller's message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:38:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4302=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4302> : streams <795356> : uri <1185307> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62874 Archived-At: > Well, it depends on the definition of "correct". The old version seems > to do what the documentation says, i.e., let binding the variable is > treated like letf. What you call "correct" may be closer to what ANSI > CL does, but such a change should be documented. Oh, I missed this "let -> letf" mapping of the old code. Now it makes more sense, thank you. I'll try and reproduce the old behavior then. Stefan