From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12660: 24.2.50; Completion not showing all candidates Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871ugyuprj.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350424075 9089 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2012 21:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12660@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 16 23:48:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TOEzX-0004uG-1R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:47:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOEzQ-0005cD-0k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOEzN-0005XT-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOEzM-0004eN-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOEzM-0004eI-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOF0Y-0004Cu-Cn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12660 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12660-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12660.135042411616134 (code B ref 12660); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12660) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2012 21:48:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47331 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOF08-0004CA-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:48:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:16961) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOF06-0004Bx-VI; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:48:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu09MCoeh/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="201833798" Original-Received: from 76-10-135-161.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.135.161]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Oct 2012 17:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5A15F59520; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:47:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871ugyuprj.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:56:56 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65671 Archived-At: tags 12660 notabug thanks > 4. M-x o-e-o TAB TAB > ,---- M-x o-e-o TAB TAB > | > | org-e-o => org-e-odt- > | > `---- If you hit ? before each of the TABs you'll understand better. On the second TAB the `partial-completion' style is not involved because simple prefix matching gives you an answer. If you don't like that, then just remove `basic' from your completion-styles. Stefan