From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87d2rkb1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvwfa3ev.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <8653DC2F-D77A-4AE8-B925-A6F0DBF2CCAC@mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371645164 10672 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2013 12:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 14:32:44 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpHZ5-0008Mk-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:32:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59412 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpHZ5-00035e-ED for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpHYw-0002w9-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpHYr-0001HO-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:42931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpHYr-0001HH-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:29 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZVy/2dsb2JhbABEDr8AF3OCHgEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoI5Wg X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZVy/2dsb2JhbABEDr8AF3OCHgEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoI5Wg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="16706789" Original-Received: from 69-165-149-114.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.149.114]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Jun 2013 08:32:24 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 80FA162F1E; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8653DC2F-D77A-4AE8-B925-A6F0DBF2CCAC@mit.edu> (chad's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:21:27 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160656 Archived-At: > I know it seems cool just to say `EWW/Emacs', but Juri's suggestion > is better, assuming that you care about standards compliance. > Reasonable humans can be forgiven for thinking that the web standards > aren't reasonable, but please *at least* include a version number. If the format is syntactically incorrect, we need to fix it, indeed. But we should not give more information (e.g. if it wants a "version number", then let's fill it with some dummy "3.14"). Stefan