From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:09:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392743519 13956 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 17:11:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16793@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 18:12:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoDE-0005tK-VR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:12:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51936 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoDE-0001Fb-Ef for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoCM-0008VS-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:11:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoCF-0005QH-BO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoCF-0005Q8-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoCE-0005kG-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16793 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16793-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16793.139274341122002 (code B ref 16793); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 17:10:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoBO-0005in-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:49272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoBK-0005iZ-QL for 16793@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3244584CED; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:10:06 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCE31E5913; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:09:42 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C805EB40FE; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:09:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:20:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85831 Archived-At: > Package: emacs > Version: 24.3.50 > X-Debbugs-Cc: rudalics@gmx.at [ The X-Debbugs-Cc should be in the email header, not in the here pseudo-header. Welcome to Debbugs ;-) ] > Martin suggests that frameset--restore should check that the root > window of the matching frame found is alive, and if not, discard that > frame and create a new one. That's doable, but it seems less than > optimal, from both a coding and UI perspective. I don't understand what this means. Why would the frame's root window not be alive? Is it because it's an "internal" window (because of a split)? deleting a frame and creating a new one is definitely not a good idea, since it can have all kinds of unintended side-effects, depending on the window manager. Stefan