From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17636: Implement SCRAM-SHA-1 SASL mechanism Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:41:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413564210 16275 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2014 16:43:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17636@debbugs.gnu.org To: Magnus Henoch Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 18:43:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAcc-00076B-HP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:43:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33535 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAcc-0004k9-7b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAcR-0004jh-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAcJ-0002rf-AE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAcJ-0002ra-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAcI-0003Or-IF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17636 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 17636-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17636.141356414713020 (code B ref 17636); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17636) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2014 16:42:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAbi-0003Nv-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:53124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfAbe-0003Nj-9S for 17636@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:42:22 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7008850A8; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:42:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68911E5B8A; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:41:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9DA5CB422F; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:41:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Magnus Henoch's message of "Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:14:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94679 > rfc2104.el was rewritten for speed in 2008, and seems to be about > twice as fast as hmac-*.el. I think hmac-*.el could be deprecated and > eventually removed; the only use in the Emacs tree is in sasl-cram.el. Sounds good. > So here is a new and improved patch for implementing SCRAM-SHA-1, that > uses the existing rfc2104.el instead of adding hmac-sha1.el. I'm not very familiar with these features and their corresponding code, but i sounds fine. > Would it be okay for a module in lisp/net to depend on a module in > lisp/gnus? I think it would be better to move rfc2104 elsewhere (probably into lisp/net). Stefan