From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 19e09cf: Ensure redisplay after evaluation Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20151106192313.30794.29154@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83oaf4o4gs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447184095 12095 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 19:34:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 20:34:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEgo-0001vj-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:34:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35104 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEgo-0001a5-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEgb-0001a0-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEga-0002AE-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:33 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:48058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwEgU-00027G-TN; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id tAAJYNpR021298; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BEF4166191; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:18:35 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5486=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5486> : inlines <3983> : streams <1535961> : uri <2080244> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193942 Archived-At: >> And just like with an advice, if you use such a hook in your ~/.emacs >> you can shoot yourself in the foot, but if you use this is one of your >> package, you might shoot the foot of your users. > Not just them. You might shoot the foot of anyone that tries > to debug a problem that is reported by the users of your package. Same holds with `advice', of course. Stefan