From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22107: 25.1; Wrong docstring for this-single-command-keys Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:44:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449857007 17373 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2015 18:03:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22107@debbugs.gnu.org To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 19:03:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S2D-0005s5-2e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:03:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S2C-0006ag-3q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S25-0006aO-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S22-00068c-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S22-00068X-23 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S21-0000XF-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:03:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22107.14498569612022 (code B ref 22107); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2015 18:02:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S1h-0000WY-3P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from x-132-204-253-139.xtpr.umontreal.ca ([132.204.253.139]:51751 helo=chicot.dit.umontreal.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S1f-0000WL-M0 for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id tBBEiFZ6029268; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5028EAE067; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:44:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:37 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5517=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5517> : inlines <4102> : streams <1552477> : uri <2099527> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109860 Archived-At: >> Indeed, C-u is now a completely normal command so there's no special >> handling of "prefix commands" for this-command-keys. >> Could you tel us where that caused a problem for you? > I wrote a package for use in screencasts, which displays the key for > some commands when you invoke them. And I wanted it to show prefix > args too. Could you give some details? More specifically, doesn't the screen-cast already give you the C-u when the prefix command itself is run? > That said, this doesn't actually affect me right now. Since I didn't > know this was a bug, I consider it a feature at least as much as a bug ;-) Stefan