From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22107: 25.1; Wrong docstring for this-single-command-keys Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:49:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87h9jt3o66.fsf@gmail.com> <838u54dgg2.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtkb882.fsf@gnu.org> <83io47blbq.fsf@gnu.org> <83egeu9lze.fsf@gnu.org> <83eget8gos.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449857429 23946 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2015 18:10:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22107@debbugs.gnu.org, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 19:10:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S8w-0003ZE-Uk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:10:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48954 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S8w-0007Ku-42 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S8r-0007Hs-BF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S8o-0008CQ-6j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S8o-0008CM-4j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S8o-0000iA-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22107.14498573582660 (code B ref 22107); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2015 18:09:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S85-0000gp-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from x-132-204-253-139.xtpr.umontreal.ca ([132.204.253.139]:51791 helo=chicot.dit.umontreal.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7S83-0000gU-41 for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id tBBEnRft029779; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D3413AE067; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:49:26 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83eget8gos.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:42:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5517=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5517> : inlines <4102> : streams <1552479> : uri <2099530> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109862 Archived-At: > In what direction should the distinction disappear? Should it always > include C-u, or should it never include it? Since C-u is now a completely normal command, the C-u that precedes is treated the same as any other command that might have been run before. IOW, the C-u should never be included. > I guess we could make such a change on master, and see if it breaks > something. I'm not sure which change you're referring to. AFAIK (and according to this bug report) the change has already been done (tho not to the docstring). Stefan