From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add systemd socket launching support Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:43:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874mbn7kmn.fsf@mattleach.net> <871t6qkc3h.fsf@mattleach.net> <8337r6v930.fsf@gnu.org> <83y48ytpah.fsf@gnu.org> <83pou9u7md.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8ldtpif.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459536254 15850 80.91.229.3 (1 Apr 2016 18:44:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: matthew@mattleach.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 20:44:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1am43B-00021q-6d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 20:44:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45901 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am43A-0002sl-Ms for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am435-0002qW-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:44:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am432-00007a-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:43:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:38649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am432-00007W-IH; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:43:56 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u31IhtHZ031722; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 14628601E1; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:43:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83a8ldtpif.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:41:44 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5629=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5629> : inlines <4633> : streams <1612450> : uri <2177407> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202572 Archived-At: >> > I'm not sure myself, but I'm not a criminal, so don't ask me about the >> > details. I just know that exposing a handle through which someone can >> > feed Emacs any commands they want is a bad idea. >> Which part of my proposal exposes such a handle? > You asked for the original version, which did that. That's the only > proposal I understand you made, and that's what I was talking about. Then I don't know wheat you mean by "expose". It's already readily available from the environment, so in which way is it more exposed? I mean, yes, it's more conveniently available, but it's not like it's otherwise "hidden" in anyway. Stefan