From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22107: this-command-keys no longer returns prefix argument Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:22:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83eg98bsmb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462976612 9096 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2016 14:23:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22107@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 16:23:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2g-0006ht-Vr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 16:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52547 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2g-00085b-77 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2c-00082E-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2U-0006vb-0c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35173) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2T-0006vW-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2T-0001IZ-Qt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22107.14629765734975 (code B ref 22107); Wed, 11 May 2016 14:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2016 14:22:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2K-0001IB-Rz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:22:53 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:31383) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0V2I-0001Hz-UF for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:22:51 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A+FgA731xV/5Yrq8BcgxCEAoVVwwsEAgKBPD0QAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBAQYCAR+LOoUFB4QtBbUEI4QUIoJ4AQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0A+FgA731xV/5Yrq8BcgxCEAoVVwwsEAgKBPD0QAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBAQYCAR+LOoUFB4QtBbUEI4QUIoJ4AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="238092882" Original-Received: from 192-171-43-150.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([192.171.43.150]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2016 10:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5704C63F2A; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:22:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Wed, 11 May 2016 14:08:49 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118128 Archived-At: > As it stands right now, is it safe to say that this-command-keys and > this-single-command-keys give the same output except that the former's > output is in string format and the latter's output is in vector format? You mean, are this-command-keys-vector and this-single-command-keys 100% equivalent all the time? I wish I was able to give you an answer. They appear to be Stefan