From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com> <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ins2jq88.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg2p8swx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831sypjmst.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> <05ba947a-970a-178c-8036-bcdf84485384@cs.ucla.edu> <83zilbgo4u.fsf@gnu.org> <20161107140228.0a60be57@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478547692 31894 195.159.176.226 (7 Nov 2016 19:41:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:41:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 07 20:41:28 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3pn4-0005dD-FF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:41:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3pn7-0006MU-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3pmZ-0006LS-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:40:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3pmU-0000e6-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:40:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=59610 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3pmU-0000dZ-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:40:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3plr-00053u-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:39:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:rBjq9zODA38g2lWuVyhDRlNomko= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209258 Archived-At: > (If you buy a new computer in China it comes with Windows 10, though > of course not necessarily a legal copy. No one would willingly buy a > machine with Windows 98 installed. It doesn't even support modern > hardware.) The argument was not for people using new machines with old OS, but people using old machines (with accompanying old OS). Stefan