From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master b389379: bytecomp: Don't inline functions that use byte-switch (Bug#26518) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:17:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170420155323.20935.84585@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170420155323.D7EB420740@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492708684 31739 195.159.176.226 (20 Apr 2017 17:18:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 17:18:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Vibhav Pant To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 20 19:17:57 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1FiO-00084U-VB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:17:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55196 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1FiU-0001Zz-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Fhx-0001Y9-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Fhr-00079n-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1Fhq-00079i-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v3KHHLK7008051; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CEE0C66200; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:17:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20170420155323.D7EB420740@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> (Vibhav Pant's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:53:23 -0400 (EDT)") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6004=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6004> : inlines <5815> : streams <1742039> : uri <2413036> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214151 Archived-At: > + ;; optimized switch bytecode makes it impossible to guess the correct > + ;; `byte-compile-depth', which can result in incorrect inlined code. I really doubt this is true. Maybe it makes it difficult/impractical, but I doubt it makes it impossible. Stefan