From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35536: 27.0.50; Expose buffer's marker list to Elisp Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 14:13:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lfzo274b.fsf@tcd.ie> <83ef5gq1po.fsf@gnu.org> <87imusztof.fsf@tcd.ie> <8336lwpxcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgtvczba.fsf@tcd.ie> <875zqrbggw.fsf@tcd.ie> <8710b9bd-f945-463b-906c-92564970ab43@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="264477"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 35536@debbugs.gnu.org, maurooaranda@gmail.com To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 23:15:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfWU-0012u5-MK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:15:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMchF-0002kX-27 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46755) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMch9-0002kS-Cq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMch8-0003Ri-Ir for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMch8-0003Rd-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMch8-00012i-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 18:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35536 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35536-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35536.15569072303981 (code B ref 35536); Fri, 03 May 2019 18:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35536) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 18:13:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMcgw-000129-9z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.201]:53376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMcgv-00011y-6f for 35536@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1007C885F53D for <35536@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:13:44 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:in-reply-to :date:date:references:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from; s=dkim; t=1556907223; x=1557771224; bh=ZAs4D/VQq2dAYOjdMY2t6QLf QSyNsZijbB22fBJ/Eu8=; b=hnMD124WMJyu2WrzhA3ed9Flzg1DSKmEjFCMLOpc lXqSD1nzr6Ptd1pYs0AMLxrteoni2Yx2yhtRafkXnL+m4Iho4UnfpyKBTvqYIE7G jE6CcmdJ+ZGPwuSY9WMT87AFw4JTHDebR44mzhF6/b6kGkwxkfT8XmMESUw83tSQ ZQkzQ8g8WacMD9fWwd3/FR9CAlc7WDf8nsO5l9+vjW0u+9NBjTpMQ37JZ+Q00oYQ dyd9JbVZ8Opzd6QNU6B3DdEVJ0ZuoMNs4ZruUkiN13fjO/H+v9DXFQ8z52j3rIdX dHA2qXUa66xE99oPr+9vye2Qknttqc7efBpPW/I6gPTgdg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iro.umontreal.ca Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nnTz8xXw_758 for <35536@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable157.163-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.163.157]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D28D885F523; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:13:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8710b9bd-f945-463b-906c-92564970ab43@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 3 May 2019 10:53:36 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158690 Archived-At: > Whether or not one should be able to depend on such > an order is a separate question. I'm fine with a `markers-in` which returns markers in the order found in the C code. But the docstring should state clearly that you can't rely on this ordering. I expect many uses won't care about the ordering anyway, so we don't need to bother `sort`ing, although the performance cost of `sort`ing will likely always be negligible. Stefan