From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug-reference.el: Allow custom handlers for opening URLs Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 13:44:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87h7wx4d24.fsf@gnu.org> <87d07l3utr.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv0w9gw6.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7wvd3uk.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo5qg8sl.fsf@gnu.org> <87eery9y7j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="42119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 20:04:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jW1vv-000Aqw-7M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:04:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37364 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW1vu-00029o-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 14:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW1cn-0007YX-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 13:44:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:50895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW1cm-0004pX-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 13:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7139F814D9; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:44:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 831C581474; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:44:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1588700692; bh=AYTtDlYG9JqWKPG7LZoSvl0kQO9ocCD6a2KvKQdsd2Y=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FQSliGhQMvLl5QjC6kyMFQtmFjD2Vt8CFWNiRTedIsRN1GMRd7xlIkQohCbNtTVfe xpRfFyXPaQ0EPdOwb/749wtSepf2k8DYkwMkgwmO1ccCG5F15SIEY48VUOqc4+4Did BMIAD/qJCGBLlh0/2KtKsFZUWsq2h2rconKrw/6erwyPiHkGLq31I6VBiUxpqEaeXI NS4GjQ62M0FcfEbnmOT4go8yA3oImFg2sfbVzjxe9jbAf8C5gshQ4D3lwsi91STpVu C/AcftWmnpLdMQWtEBFc02Cm19E8b9wguPfJegKmSTSKB95pjOGPRE7dH23f7PbGhn lb3K4ZJlbh1nQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B63E120636; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:44:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87eery9y7j.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Tue, 05 May 2020 17:51:44 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/05 13:23:34 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249018 Archived-At: > I want to come to a decision now. What should we choose? Either > > (a) a defvar for packages to plug in their url handler plus a > defcustom for the user's preferences and to override the defvar's > values, or > > (b) just a single defvar being used by both packages and the user. > I'm also open for an option (c). :-) They all sound good. Tho I wonder what happened with option (d), Stefan