From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: search-invisible and friends Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:21:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zh5z9l9y.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2ljj7i6.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9gmkjdb.fsf@gnu.org> <875z8l95cp.fsf@gnus.org> <83een9kdkl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11356"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 15:22:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMWz-0002qj-Lo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:22:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMWy-0007yf-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMW2-0006b5-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:21:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMVz-0007Bc-6E; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:21:29 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 89384440FBD; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E1D0C440FBA; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:21:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1599744083; bh=dkjiGY5I0A9rjjJ1rmLZK8oAZWnnctN9DUnccSiLEYg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=e5XsQVUkkcBU7nJZoXeAzsKSYfdndJNpKeVpmSSLm+FZRTrUJ/siq0PKZxlluHqBR tkdWrJOkLSkKXmVHKwNUIHUtXqRh9eTgllUlAHlwWv1gTLRwfa0amXx6JqZ+d+K8du gpNdFRnq6N4of8w4zStJrEdZzBnV45y3Lws6ZW37lzNRLlDGjrfPVtek2qVZj1zr3q aKCSsDApvmmJCMDZVHqquZEbULFAtsKZjCf9hJ/hOZBdcReVUVmSpFFxZadIPiHQa1 72PlTWPOgTwLsWMhXccZNuTB0LNd8/AF7BIo4PeV3iNmavdbJbxIkL7DxzME70ImBo i6gLpSlTi3ZmA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F39F1203FD; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:21:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83een9kdkl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:42:50 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/10 09:21:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254994 Archived-At: >> So basically mash up this stuff into a convenient DEFUN? >> >> && !NILP (val = get_char_property_and_overlay >> (make_fixnum (PT), Qdisplay, selected_window, >> &overlay)) >> && display_prop_intangible_p (val, overlay, PT, PT_BYTE) > Yes, something like that. Agreed. > But what about 'display' properties on overlay strings? do we want to > support that as well? We don't need it for the `search-invisible` case because those display properties can only ever hide text that's not really in the buffer in the first place (it's an after/before string). Stefan