From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:47:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <835yq9ls7j.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11240176288f@heytings.org> <83h79tjd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11f58780b580@heytings.org> <83v8y8ij39.fsf@gnu.org> <6a5bb5a08b3d764611f9@heytings.org> <87o83z5tfa.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ee4vmhh1.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40124"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Po Lu , =?windows-1252?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 20:48:58 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCoHq-000ABN-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 20:48:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48512 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCoHo-0000Cv-Sr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCoGb-0007bG-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:23159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCoGY-0001It-A8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:47:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 64E1C10018E; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:47:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D581E100183; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:47:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1643226454; bh=C4DA6hhKc3+SGNavB850vK3+A7B7zuPm5GgYVMpf/jg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EeilbAU7ATXFww91N9OCGRpGSQXuFOap3oT29I++YFx+jdDmdJhpx9ZJ3Ae5TKgD6 uceRCZWbNqL8fkqceo/lT/q0D3sD3OJ4YV36BO4/R47Pbg5qUJuH2XMBILfyznb2XB qUw4aXk50zPSc9EJVd3obD97iM+NNdiEXtS7elIz9/g+nfqBCjvcruMMl3Cm3qlsnf Ue+fOVR7RiyyAKAkqnlxaY3jak10yexPYbCYgH4L/cbTZUQpIRHOLKKaVoUEF7cANR NyAO8mtYOOWqOM77O7+RmzEYBGNKeWaVRTU/7RXnMV1YJYmuq3YKSaifDk0Y6nyaPi NEV55eXUB99ZQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4228120746; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:47:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:46:40 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285455 Archived-At: >> that the new feature (which finally makes byte compiler warnings accurate) > They are not accurate, they are _more_ accurate than earlier. See Stefan's > answer above. Just to clarify: IMO they are significantly more accurate, and I really appreciate the improvement. The problem is that most Emacs users don't spend nearly as much time looking at ELisp's compiler warnings, so imposing a 10% slowdown for them would be a steep price to pay for the benefit of those who do look at those warnings. Stefan