From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:47:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pmfill6l.fsf@gnu.org> <87illaffm5.fsf@localhost> <838rm6ktxp.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ovdosz.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18134"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 09 05:49:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNJP-0004X8-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 05:49:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNJO-0002vU-F0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNHl-00020d-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:6488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNHd-0002OX-1U; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B98C100189; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 23:47:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EC5BC100084; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 23:47:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1665287237; bh=SwMJKL1/YlhJKwYVCZOCfLboaI+GlhQdQ6+fmZ4wxx0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=F0UqyfvCsx3kanHZjEwKO0NdQ0m0Bf6s+q3E4wpBzH4TQl/COspJ0+iwWSp3ieLzA tjjQ1/k9OkA+OipcvRe/ONu16vWEH8BFjUYiADXWrcB1Go6GbjgeRY8jlsDAU4O5En KOABW2DZhwO+bJP6tiuTwgrIv9BPRp3THCF+92U2kM2UBbDya4Qd1Xx25CeuFJWYqi q0DPaqbkfqtyXaD2fw9fp6kGjPJJnKq59OP7c9fR/Jk2xH7zZ66MCjCE8WjnhIES/4 Rwy2acxOKvDDHivOl7TZDwA9g4omxkukiMwHVselg60wQ17R3OFpyO4rCrdDR39X94 E5m2+vHvnhH1g== Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-220-202.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDD61120866; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 23:47:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87v8ovdosz.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 08 Oct 2022 10:36:28 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297237 Archived-At: > Update: I can no longer see crashes on the latest commit in the branch. Thanks for the update. > There are a couple of glitches though: > 1. hl-line-mode overlay sometimes disappear > 2. notmuch search buffer hides text in wrong places (see the attached video) Hmm... that's worrisome. > Should I report these things as proper bugs or is it OK to discuss them > within this thread? As Eli said, bug-reports are best. I don't read the bug-reports list, so I'd appreciate if you can add me to the `X-Debbugs-Cc:` when you report those bugs. > Also, I did a small test comparing Org mode folding performance (using > overlays) on master vs feature/noverlay branch using the methodology > described in https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2022-05-31-folding.html: Very cool, thanks! > We also have tests for marker scaling. If the overlay tree > implementation can be reused for markers, it would also be great. That's definitely not on the current menu. It's not out of the question, but would require a fair bit more work and will come with new tradeoffs. Stefan