From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:40:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202852490 16841 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2008 21:41:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 12 22:41:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JP2sm-0002iC-QT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:41:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JP2sJ-00010X-Ah for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JP2s9-0000sM-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JP2s7-0000pz-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JP2s7-0000pc-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JP2s3-0004OD-Ed; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-187.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.187]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1CLesrQ031414; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:40:54 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 65832B40DF; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:40:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:44:55 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered BAYES_00=-2.5, HAS_X_HELO=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88908 Archived-At: > You probably misunderstood: I did not do anything, I just described the > setup I have used until now to keep it up-to-date, in the hope that it > will be useful to (and preserved by) whoever does this particular update. > The part that isn't clear to me is whether that branch currently > includes any of his changes that are not in the trunk. Does it? > If it does, should any of those changes be installed? There are some differences between the two, but I believe they're all changes that we applied and the he preferred not to include in his version. In any case we should strive to minimize the differences. Stefan