From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r69wcxn7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87prp7vo3k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <873aluxjqg.fsf@jurta.org> <87vdyqnlq9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871w1et6ra.fsf@jurta.org> <874p68pqcj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217354106 8364 80.91.229.12 (29 Jul 2008 17:55:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Roland Winkler To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 29 19:55:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNtQI-0006Et-M5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:55:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37534 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNtPO-0003DU-Dt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNtOv-00037i-Jk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNtOu-00037I-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35581 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNtOt-00037F-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:47729) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNtOp-0002dD-AA; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:15 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-151.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.151]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6THsCBw029234; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5A53A1C139; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:54:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874p68pqcj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:11:56 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3070=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101705 Archived-At: > I think it may be better to keep this for 23.2, but please do write up Indeed, it doesn't matter much anyway: it is not a crucial fonctionality (and it already works right now), so there's no strong reason to push it for 23.1. At the same time, proced.el is new in Emacs-23, so we can be a bit more permissive w.r.t late additions in that it won't be a regression compared to Emacs-22 anyway. Stefan