From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's handling of line numbers [from bug#5042] Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <837ho6czb6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271515533 3773 80.91.229.12 (17 Apr 2010 14:45:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mark.lillibridge@hp.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 17 16:45:31 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O39H1-0003re-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:45:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O39H0-0004DJ-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O39Gw-0004Ck-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36391 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O39Gu-0004Aw-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O39Gs-0006n6-P5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:55938 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O39Gq-0006ly-4g; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:20 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAN1lyUvO+LLb/2dsb2JhbACcAHK8UYUQBItr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,227,1270440000"; d="scan'208";a="61072178" Original-Received: from 206-248-178-219.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.178.219]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2010 10:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 587158180; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:45:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <837ho6czb6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:29:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123805 Archived-At: > What are these two ``kinds'' of restriction you are talking about, and > how are they relevant to the issue at hand, which is how to number > lines when a buffer is narrowed? He's proposing to distinguish between two different kinds of narrowing (aka "restrictions"). How they'd be implemented/distinguished is still up in the air, AFAIK. Stefan