From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is this-command-keys missing? Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:42:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293979477 24207 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2011 14:44:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 02 15:44:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZPAP-0002Mj-IL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:44:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZPAN-00023q-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55325 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZP8Q-0000nN-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:42:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZP8O-0001gZ-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:42:13 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:3769 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZP8O-0001gQ-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:42:12 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEANIcIE1Ld/TY/2dsb2JhbACkR3S7LoVKBIRljhs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,263,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="86898506" Original-Received: from 75-119-244-216.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.244.216]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 02 Jan 2011 09:42:11 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E182858DFC; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 09:42:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 2 Jan 2011 05:29:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134167 Archived-At: >> - disable your binding, then push this-command-raw-keys back on >> =A0unread-command-events, while arranging to re-enable the binding >> =A0after the next command. > I do not think it will work here since the key seems to be already > translated in raw-keys. AFAIK this-command-raw-keys returns raw untranslated keys, as the name implies. So as before: if this-command-keys or this-command-raw-keys doesn't return the data you expect, please send actual concrete data showing the problem. Until that time, I'll consider your reports as "pilot errors". Stefan